Campus
Class Put on Pause
Brown Berets and students protest mayor’s stance on immigration legislation
By Chelsea Hawkins & Laurel Fujii
City on a Hill Press
Published June 2, 2011 at 2:35 am

Students and the Watsonville Brown Berets want Santa Cruz mayor and UCSC lecturer Ryan Coonerty to support AB 1081, the Trust Act. They staged their protest unannounced in Coonerty’s Law and Democracy class on May 25. Photos by Sal Ingram.

It was a normal Wednesday lecture in Engineering 2 last week. Students discussed their upcoming final with Santa Cruz mayor and lecturer Ryan Coonerty.

Then, around 40 UC Santa Cruz students and Watsonville Brown Beret members unexpectedly entered the classroom. As they circled the room holding signs that read “Shame on you Ryan Coonerty” and “Si con AB 1081,” they addressed Coonerty, then ceded the floor for his response.

On their website, the Watsonville Brown Berets describe themselves as a community force organized to defend and liberate their barrios. Brown Beret members were joined by sympathetic UCSC students as they appealed to Coonerty to support a resolution on AB 1081.

“We feel you acted cowardly,” said Sandino Gomez, a Brown Beret, in a statement addressed to the mayor. “Why did you stand against the resolution?”

AB 1081, known as the Trust Act, focuses on illegal immigration and deportation issues. Under AB 1081, a county can maintain the right to refuse to send fingerprints of all arrested individuals to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Currently, counties are required to send this information to ICE as part of a program known as Secure Communities.

Secure Communities, in correlation with Homeland Security and the Department of Justice, works to identify and deport illegal immigrants. Demonstrators say that according to the policies of Secure Communities, non-criminals are being deported.

“Because of Secure Communities, families are being destroyed,” Gomez said. “Employers are losing employees, partners are losing partners.”

AB 1081 would counteract Secure Communities. A resolution supporting AB 1081 would solidify Coonerty’s support for the bill, but would not make any legislative change.

Coonerty has thus far not decided to voice support for AB 1081.

He told demonstrators his position on the Trust Act is directly related to his belief that it is not a policy the county should be focusing its energy on. Instead, he suggested that the demonstrators engage in a dialogue with government officials at the state and federal level where change would be more effective.

“You can engage in all this rhetoric that is empty, or you can go out and try to change something,” Coonerty said to the demonstrators.

Nonetheless, the demonstrators maintain that what they want from Coonerty is open support of the Trust Act through a resolution — and they want to know why he is choosing not to.

“It’s not enough to say, ‘It’s not my responsibility, not my issue,’” Gomez said. “We’re looking for him to take a symbolic stand. We’re quite aware the resolution is not going to change policy.”

The atmosphere quickly changed when one demonstrator spoke out, cutting off Coonerty.

In response, members of the class began to speak up, reminding the demonstrators that Coonerty had allowed them their chance to speak. Although the demonstrators only remained in the room for approximately 10 minutes, the tension was palpable.

“We came to hold him accountable,” Tomas Alejo, one of the demonstrators, said. “For him not to support our resolution when he had a majority of the community in favor of it is him not paying attention to the values that he preaches.”

Coonerty said for as long as he’s been with the university, he has not seen a protest carried out this way. The protest left Coonerty’s class with mixed feelings.

“A lot of students were aggravated because [Coonerty] was talking about the final,” third-year Maria Isabel Capacete said.

Others were sympathetic to the demonstrators’ cause, but still disagreed with their methods.

“I think the cause they’ve chosen to undertake is an important one,” third-year Guy Herschmann said. “But I think the way they handled it was inappropriate.”

The demonstrators said they were not looking to upset students.

“We don’t want to impact their education in a negative way,” Gomez said. “If anything, our goal was that students would learn something and would perhaps think about the issue in a different light.”

Coonerty explained Santa Cruz has worked on creating and implementing a helpline for immigrant workers, and Santa Cruz is known as a sanctuary city for non-citizens.

“[The Brown Berets and I] have been on the same side on a lot of issues and on different sides on a lot of other issues,” Coonerty said. “Like everything in politics, we don’t always see eye to eye. I respect their passion and I respect the concerns they raise. They are really vital concerns.”

Comments
Info for Commenting: Commenter's Code | Privacy Policy
  • No S-Comm

    Dear concerned,

    First of all why do you think that all individuals that took part in this action were not students, can it be that the majority of them are Latino therefore not good qualified to be students? For your information most of the people that took part in this action were students including members from various UCSC organization such as Students Informing Now (SIN) ans MEChA.

    In addition, some of the participant have been involved in direct meetings with several assembly members including Bill Monning who actually became a co-sponsor of the bill (AB1081). Moreover, activist across the nation of been involved directly in their communities getting local resolutions passed denouncing Secure Communities and supporting bills, such as AB1081, in order to send a solidified message to governors and to the president.

    What was not stated in this article was that similar resolutions were passed by the Watsonville City Council and the Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors. According to some organization who worked on the resolutions, several attempts were made to meet with Ryan Coonerty but he failed to give the matter any importance. Coonerty was targeted because he directly led the efforts at the Santa Cruz City Council to defeat the resolution supporting AB1081.

    One of the many justifications used by him was that if Tony Madrigal, the only Latino on the City Council, would not have introduced the resolution he might have supported it. This shows that he put his personal agenda over the lives of dozens of families being separated over an unjust policy, therefore we stand by our actions against Coonerty. And for your information, we have jobs and fighting for justice in our community is the best thing we can do with our lives thank you jerk!

    -more concerned

    • http://twitter.com/Ramenth Sam Rosen

      Probably because only a handful of the protesters admitted to being students? 

    • Concerned

      Dear ‘more concerned / No S-Comm’

      In response to your first point, the protestors ethnicity had nothing to do with my point about them being (or not being) students. Please re-read your post and consider how you are promoting racism with your blanket assumption. The non-students I was referencing (for the record) were, to quote the article, the “Brown Beret members [who] were joined by sympathetic UCSC students.” From the wording of this sentence in the article, this lead me to believe that there were people who were not students participating in this protest. Furthermore, it did not seem that most of these protestors were students of this class, hence my comment on “these non-students (and students not enrolled in the class).” 

      In response to the rest of your comments:
      I agree with you that fighting for what you believe in is an important and valid exercise. I have no qualms with people expressing their opinions, interests, or problems with the government. The main problem I had with this ‘protest’ was that people were disrupting a class when there are significantly better forums. To me, this seemed like nothing more than a publicity stunt at the cost of the education of the students in the class, which (from reading the article) appears that the majority of the students enrolled in the lecture were not participating in the protest. All-in-all, I thought it was ironic that someone was holding up a sign about education (see the picture) while disrupting a class over an assembly bill which A. has nothing to do with education and B. the major doesn’t vote on. 

      Please fight for further justice in the community, just make sure that you aren’t causing other injustices in the process.

      -Concerned

      P.S. Calling people names is impolite.

    • Teko2012

      Dear Concerned,
      We are not sorry for interrupting your class for the 10 minutes. For us this is much much more than an  assembly bill, it is about people’s lives, the separation of families, people being unjustly incarcerated, children losing their parents, people dying, right now!! One of the protestors in the room that day had tragically lost her brother due to this policy of Secure Communities. So yes it was about publicity, to bring attention to a critical issue and to hold certain people accountable for failing to uphold the values that they have publicly preached about and have been awarded for. Now if we had prevented you from attending school, or would have eliminated your education, I would have understood your frustration, but I assume you still took your final, went home and went on with your life as usual. We fight for justice where it is needed, not where you prescribe, thank you.

      P.s. If the shoe fits…

  • http://twitter.com/Ramenth Sam Rosen

    Shouldn’t this be in the Opinion and Editorial section, since there’s almost no actual reporting going on in the article, and the pictures were clearly taken by the protesters? 

    • http://twitter.com/gronquil Gregory Ronquillo

      The photos were taken by Sal Ingram, who is part of the City on a Hill Press photo staff and attending this event as a journalist. The article features quotes from both the opposition and protesters and includes the facts behind the protests and AB 1081. It’s also written in the ‘objective journalist’ voice instead of the looser ‘editorial voice’.

    • Anonymous

      Ah, yes, silly me. I’d forgotten that City on a Hill Press subscribed to the Fox News style of journalism, as opposed to real journalism. Then again, they’re students. What more can be expected? 

    • Isabel

      Who better to explain what happened then the students who have been directly affected. There is no need to insult the work of the students who have worked hard to write this article.

  • Anonymous

     Typical diatribe from idiots who try to belittle those they
    don’t agree with: “support this, do that, don’t argue” In other words, “shut
    up because I don’t agree with you.”