Campus
Anti-Abortion Group Visits Campus
Controversial pro-life images and messages incite debate
By Laurel Fujii
City on a Hill Press
Published October 6, 2011 at 2:00 am

As graphic visuals of abortions lined Quarry Plaza on Oct. 4 and 5, members of the anti-abortion group Sanctity of Human Life (SOHL) handed out DVDs and pamphlets to students and other Quarry Plaza passersby. Some accepted the literature while others engaged in heated debate.

Hiss Kurmiņa (left) and Kristen Swig (right) argue with a Sanctity of Human Life member who was protesting abortion in Quarry Plaza on Tuesday. Photo by Nick Paris.

“We’re bringing the truth about abortion and how it not only kills an innocent human being but hurts women,” said SOHL leader Bud, who does not release his last name out of concern for his privacy.

SOHL is in its third year of Northern California college campus tours, and visited UC Santa Cruz this week.

While SOHL said their goal is to educate students on how they view abortions, some students expressed differing opinions.

“They’re throwing the Bible at us,” fourth-year Tracy Garcia said. “What are they trying to prove, bringing these pictures here?”

Bud was not surprised at students’ reactions, and wanted the engaged debates to occur.

“Images tell stories,” Bud said. “This gets their attention…professors aren’t addressing this issue, or if they do, they say the woman should have the right to choose. Right now, women have the right to choose — it’s the law of the land. Just like in slavery, people had the right to have slaves. But it’s an injustice.”

Third-year Stephanie Calderon spoke to a SOHL member, whom she said was nice, but noted the demographics of the SOHL volunteers.

“An older, white man can’t feel what it’s like to have a baby,” Calderon said.

Fourth-year Tessa Mizokami designed her own sign that read, “Your body, your right” to silently protest the anti-abortion group. Another sign made by students addressed the religious aspect of SOHL’s argument and read, “I believe in God and choice.”

The UCSC Women’s Center notified students via email of SOHL’s presence on the morning of Oct. 4.

“We are merely concerned that the group’s methods of exposure to violent imagery and use of inflammatory language may upset or disturb some folks on campus, especially those who are survivors of violence themselves,” the email read.

Women’s Center director Stephanie Milton said she heard about students’ interactions with SOHL at other schools through her network of Women’s Center staff throughout the state.

“This method of subscribing to Christianity is harming to UCSC’s principles of community,” Milton said.

Like the students, Milton experienced mixed encounters with SOHL members. One approached her cordially, but another loudly commented about something Milton said to someone else.

“I found him sarcastic and I don’t hold that in good faith,” she said.

The Women’s Center and several student organizations tabled in Quarry Plaza around SOHL, and the Women’s Center is inviting a reproductive justice organization to table this quarter to expand this discussion of reproduction, Milton said.

“They believe in what they’re doing and we believe in what we’re doing,” she said. “As a woman, I’d say it hurts me. I have a problem when people try to subscribe morality to my body.”

 

Additional reporting by Chelsea Hawkins

Comments
Info for Commenting: Commenter's Code | Privacy Policy
  • Neil

    The liberal bias at these state schools is so evident when you look at what the teachers say and don’t say about these social issues.

    • Steven

      is it a coincidence that liberalism and education are positively correlated?

  • Sharon

    In response to the UCSC Women’s Center email: “We are merely concerned that the group’s methods of exposure to violent
    imagery and use of inflammatory language may upset or disturb some
    folks on campus, especially those who are survivors of violence
    themselves,” the email read. I find it ironic that that “exposure to violent imagery” is all they  seem to be concerned about. Not that this violent imagery is the reality for over 3,000 innocent little male and female human beings every day by law in this country. And the best argument from those that defend “Choice” have is “my body my choice” when in reality the little human’s had no choice and what about their bodies. Are we so selfish that we are more concerned that students are exposed to violent imagery and not that the imagery relfects an act of violence against an innocent human being that the Women’s Center makes no comment about.

    • Lindsay

      Sharon, I totally agree with you! No one ever thinks of the little babies’ choice to life. It’s tragic that in a free country, some don’t even have the freedom to choose be alive. No one ever thinks about what the fetus may grow up to be! The next Einstein or Picasso, the possibilities are endless. Similarly, each sperm and egg could be a whole person and they never get to choose if they want to live. People who use condoms are sinners that will burn in hell, it’s genocide! Millions are killed! Sharon, I wish you the best, you are a beacon of hope, in an ignorant and illogical world.

    • Bud

      Steven.  I sense that you greatly contribute to the “ignorant and illogical world” of which you mock.

  • Anonymous

    It is a common misconception to say that the baby is a part of the woman’s body. But that rhetoric does not hold up scientifically. The baby has it’s own DNA and blood type. It simply resides inside the mother; it is not “her body”. So it is inaccurate to say “my body, my choice”. Secondly, if we agree that the imagery is “violent” then why is abortion legal?

  • sb

    Great job Laurel and Chelsea.  I was really proud of the way that students supported each other the days of the demonstration.  I will continue to support Planned Parenthood and other outlets who support women and offer family planning.  Sohlnet is very concerned about fetuses, I am concerned about the quality of life for the child outside the womb.  I pray for the people of this anti-choice group and I hope that they find the courage to use their resources to positively impact the community.

    • Sharon

      It doesn’t take courage to give resources. It takes courage to take a stand against child sacrifice when it has become politically correct and we call it “choice” Students at UCSC have the courage to fight injustice and give resources to those who make the right “choice.” Why can’t we do both?

    • sb

      It is cowardly to stand in a public place with pictures of bloody fetuses under the guise of “truth” or “the lord’s work” when there are living and breathing humans (not fetuses) that need help and need advocates.  This group takes the easy way out when they could be helping the homeless, working with at risk youth or counseling couples on healthy relationships.  

  • Bud

    Confronting injustice to the innocents in a free society will be denounced and mocked by those who priviledge or profit by the continuation the injustice.  In America we have sown injustices on Native Americans, people of color, children (child labor), women and others.  In wisdom and with regret we now look back on these injiustices.  One day we will look back on the injustice of baby killing and we will hopefully fulfill our promise of “justice for all.” 

  • http://twitter.com/milton224 Stephanie Milton

    I, too, applaud Laurel and Chelsea’s reporting of such a strong, emotionally-charged set of issues. Thank you to everyone who engaged in discourse with integrity; we cannot change intolerance with more intolerance.