Campus
Students Set to Protest March 1
Organizers aim to shut down UCSC campus
By Jacob Teal
City on a Hill Press
Published February 23, 2012 at 1:47 am

Illustration by Christine Hipp

After months of posters plastered over signposts, chalk on sidewalk, and graffiti on walls, March 1 is almost here.

The March 1 protest will be a lead-up to the March 5 protest in Sacramento, which aims to give students the opportunity to lobby against cuts to higher education and lobby for tax initiatives to prevent those cuts.

Noah Miska, one of the many UCSC General Assembly members organizing the protest, said collaboration would be the key to the event’s success.

“[It is about] focusing energy from the Occupy movement into a series of mass mobilizations to push for the re-funding of social services in California,” Miska said.

The March 1 protest has attracted international attention as well.

“March 1 has snowballed into an international day of action, with reports of solidarity actions being organized as far away as Korea and Sudan,” Miska said. “The biggest teachers’ union in the UK, representing some 200,000 instructors, is also going on strike for March 1.”

Protesters at UC Santa Cruz intend to block the entrances to the campus and erect a university of tents at the base of campus. There will be food, discussions and activities like workshops and skill-shares, throughout the day.

Miska ties the “tent university” to the Occupy movement.

“The tents are partly for shelter and partly symbolic of the connection between the UC budget crisis and the socioeconomic inequality highlighted by the Occupy movement,” Miska said. “The budget crisis is a result of the fact that this university is managed by and for the 1 percent. What would a university run by and for the 99 percent look like? The tent university is an opportunity to begin finding answers to that question.”

Protesters plan to block campus entrances and let only essential personnel like medical staff and emergency vehicles past in hopes of shutting down UCSC.

Miska said a large act of protest like shutting down campus for a day really captures people’s attention.

“When we do big things, they hear about it,” Miska said. “If the first is big, the fifth will be bigger. We feed each other’s fires.”

While the planned protest has gotten significant attention, some students are apathetic about the protest.

“My favorite thing about these kinds of protests is that I get to stay home and sleep really late,” said Zach Hammond, a third-year Porter student.

“Even if I still have class, I’m not such a dedicated student that I will walk up two miles of hills with no buses,” he said.

Some feel that the Day of Action won’t draw enough attention.

“Nobody gives a fuck about our fees,” said second-year Sheila Allen-Cooley.

Despite this, Allen-Cooley said students need to protest against the tuition hikes caused in part by these state budget cuts.

“If I wanted to pay this amount of money, I would’ve gone to a private college,” Allen-Cooley said. “I think it is rude of them to charge for classes when I feel like I have to teach myself.”

Miska doesn’t anticipate police action on March 1 as long as protesters do what they say they will. For students who want to get involved and stand against tuition hikes and budget cuts, all you have to do is show up, Miska said.

“It’s going to be an epic day,” he said.

Comments
Info for Commenting: Commenter's Code | Privacy Policy
  • Jkafouros

    But what about students who don’t support this cause and cannot attend the classes that they are paying for? Is this “movement” going to reimburse me for lost class time? What about lost wages for personnel? Not everyone who works for the university or attends it are the 1%. These tactics alienate other students and personnel. I understand that you want to “get the attention” of those in charge, but doing it at the cost of the education of your fellow students is not the answer.

    • notahippieiswear!

      I think its sort of a longer term strategy. The idea is that all of us giving up one day now could lead to everyone getting better and cheaper education in the future.

  • Staff

    UCSC has a long history of well attended and in many cases policy changing protests.  My awareness is that when actions block traffic or trash buildings (Grad Commons, Hahn or Kerr Hall) they dilute the vital message for change and reduces the support of many that would support a less destructive message.  

    Examples in our history include an encampment on the lawn near McHenry, a gathering in the McHenry library lobby that continued to allow the library and local offices to function or a human chain that wrapped around Hahn that got attention but did not disrupt the University as a whole.

    Reduce the disruption and the vandalism (graffiti mentioned in the article) and more people will support the message.