Campus
Palestinian Awareness Week Disrupted
Student interrupts poetry reading at Cultural Solidarity Night
By Tracy Tieu
ttieu@cityonahillpress.com
Published May 31, 2012 at 12:36 pm

Correction: In the original version of this story, City on a Hill Press used the word “allegedly” in describing the interruption of the event. CHP apologizes: we did not mean to dispute that the interruption took place. The online version of the article reflects this change. 

The Committee for Justice in Palestine (CJP) at UC Santa Cruz was wrapping up its week-long awareness week on May 24 when its final event, Cultural Solidarity Night, was interrupted by a student who opposed the event’s content, CJP signer and fourth-year film and digital media major Rebecca Pierce said.

Cultural Solidarity Night served as the closing event for CJP’s annual Palestinian Awareness Week, which ran from May 21 to May 24.

The week featured day events held in Quarry Plaza that invited passersby to participate in interactive displays in addition to the Wall of Flags memorial, which was assembled in honor of Palestinian and Israeli children killed in the conflict since 2000.

Evening events featured lectures including “Trauma and Resilience in the Gaza Strip” by UCSC psychology professor Tony Hoffman and “But is it ‘Apartheid’?” by Stanford professor Khalil Barhoum. A multimedia teach-in and prisoner’s art show was also held in the College Nine and Ten Multipurpose Room on May 22.

Pierce said that although the disruption of the cultural show during Palestinian Awareness Week was a shock, contrasting views of the Israel-Palestine conflict were anticipated.

“Hosting an event that’s so controversial, there’s always a possibility that people who disagree will make their case known,” Pierce said, “but this was the first time I’ve ever seen a cultural event be disrupted in this way.”

Pierce said the student disrupted guest poet Remi Kanazi during a performance of a poem addressing the Iraq War. The student accused Kanazi of spreading “lies” and “propaganda,” she said.

Pierce said the student denounced the event for failing to provide a “fair dialogue performance.”

“I tried to explain to [the student] the free speech policy at UCSC, but [the student] wouldn’t stop shouting, even when [Kanazi] tried to reason with her,” Pierce said. “We were able to get it under control, though.”

However, Pierce said, the behavior that disrupted Kanazi’s performance represents an issue on campus that must be addressed.

“Some events on campus are going to be met with a hostile response. Others are not,” Pierce said. “Being aware of the campus free speech policy is an important thing to know when looking at ways to share your message. Making sure your actions are effectively saying whatever it is that you want to say is really important. You have to be aware of your rights and the rights of others.”

Despite the disruption that interrupted the week’s final event, Pierce said she believed Palestinian Awareness Week still fulfilled CJP’s goals.

“Overall, the event was successful,” Pierce said. “The message we were trying to get across still came through and a lot of people came out to learn about the message we were trying to spread.”

Comments
Info for Commenting: Commenter's Code | Privacy Policy
  • Brian

    Why not reach out to the student who ‘disrupted’ the event to get his or her side of the story? I know that might be controversial to some, but journalism is journalism; getting both sides of the story should not be confused with endorsing one side or the other.  

    • Anon

      Would you like to be interviewed about breaking campus policy? CJP didn’t go forward with pressing charges within the school against this guy. He’s lucky!

    • Brian

      I know this is difficult for you to understand, since you go to a school with a very weak journalism program. Let me break it down for you: when covering a conflict, journalists should reach out to both sides in the dispute. I suggest you find a basic journalism textbook and read it. 

    • Brian

      I don’t want to be too harsh on the writer though. Without a strong journalism program that explains that reporters are not beholden to one side or another in a dispute, and have their own set of rules, student journalists are left to muddle through as best they can — which can be rough sledding in an environment as stultifyingly doctrinaire as UCSC

    • Anonymous

      there are no 2 sides you idiot somebody started yelling in the middle of a performance which is against UC policy. you can protest outside the venue all you want but you cant interrupt any event. maybe with your ‘strong journalism degree’ maybe you could do your own research…or stfu

    • Brian

      Telling people to ‘STFU’ is hardly consistent with open and honest dialogue. 

      It’s not the job of student journalists to enforce University of California policy — however reasonable (and I believe it is) — that’s the job of the University of California. 

      Reporting on both sides doesn’t mean taking a side. 

    • Anonymous

      please then brian, with all your experience from ‘better schools of journalism’ than ucsc, explain the ‘other side’ that you want represented in this story?

    • Brian

      By all means, if you think the UCSC community is well served by journalism that relies on single-source stories that adhere to a party line and doesn’t even name all the parties involved (forget about even asking those involved why they chose to behave as they did), then you’ll get the journalism you deserve. I don’t blame the author for this, I blame the audience. 

    • kharra

      Brian, the article is about the disruption that occurred during Palestinian awareness week..the purpose of this article is not to tell two sides of this issue regarding Palestine/Israel, but merely to make aware that there was a disturbance at said event….get off your journalistic high horse bullshit 

    • Brian

      Your repeated use of profanity highlights the lack of integrity of your ideas. If all you can do is fling obscenities I suggest you concede the discussion to adults and get back to your classes. Once you’re out of junior high school maybe you’ll have something to contribute. Or does your language reflect UCSC’s academic standards? 

    • Kharra

      Repeated use? Im pretty sure in my whole statement there is one use of profanity, “bullshit”….and bullshit is exactly was has been spewing out of youre mouth so quit trying to act all high and mighty because you dont curse or because you are some zionist SHIThead

  • Bouba

    That’s not the point brian, she is entitled to her opinion that’s true, but i’m sure across the board we were taught not to interrupt someone while they are speaking which she did. 

    • Brian

      See my reply to ‘concerned reader,’ above. 

  • City boy

    I think the real question is who was the individual disrupting the event and what are their politics.

    • Brian

      Inquiring minds want to know. That’s why we have a free press. City on a Hill needs to step it up. 

  • concerned reader

    we already know both sides of the story brian, the point is they were trying to tell theirs, in this case through the art of poetry, and it is being disrupted by “her” side of the story….this was not the time for “open dialouge”…this was the time to shut yo muh fucken mouf up and listen 

    • Brian

      Read my comment again. I’m not arguing that the event’s organizer’s need to do anything. 

      I’m saying the journalist who covered this event has a journalistic duty to reach out to both sides in this dispute. 

      That’s journalism 101. I know UCSC doesn’t have a strong journalism curriculum, but it’s pretty simple. 

    • AMS

      I attended UCSC and its journalism program, which is actually a class that students take time out of their majors/minors to complete because they are passionate about becoming journalists. I am now a working journalist. I have to say that the program absolutely teaches students to interview people from both sides of any issue. That said, I agree that this student journalist should have interviewed the woman that interrupted the event. If it was not possible to find the interrupter for comment, or if the interrupter refused to comment, it is vital that a journalist include that fact within the article so that readers are aware. I am absolutely sure, however, that the City on a Hill class discussed this article in detail. Their class advisor does not let issues of integrity like this one go unaddressed, ever. It’s important to remember that CHP is a class, and a STUDENT-run paper. Everyone involved is learning. This very well may have been the author’s first article ever. In this paper’s environment, you learn by doing. Unfortunately, sometimes that means an article will lack professional journalism ethics. As this student journalist progresses, I’m sure they will step it up. 

  • Campus politics

    Disruptions like this happen on both sides. In fact, when you look at the facts, this campus’ pro-Palestinian/anti-Israel groups have been VERY civil as compared with groups across California.

    UC Davis anti-Israel hecklers (note the failure of the campus police to even just ask him to leave):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45MB-ANIVls

    • UCSC Alumn

      Thank you for recognizing the civility of UCSC’s Palestinian advocacy groups.
      I would point out, however, that it is quite possible to be pro-Palestinian without being anti-Israel.  Having met some of the people in the CJP (the UCSC Palestinian advocacy group in question), I find them to be opposed to Israeli policies, but not to be anti-Israel.  There is a difference.
      In fact, arguably it is necessary to be pro-Palestinian in order to be pro-Israel.  Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians is, ironically, tearing Israel apart.

  • Kharris

    Why would City on the Hill “apologize” for disputing the disruption took place? Using the word allegedly is responsible. Or are they scared of offending a minority gorup?