AFSCME 3299 demonstrators fill the intersection of 4th St. and 16th St. of San Francisco by marching and chanting along the crosswalks.
Photo by Christina Bulosan.

For the second time in a little over five months, AFSCME 3299 members went on strike. This time, however, it’s not from the absence of a contract, but receiving one they did not ask for.

Earlier this month, the university imposed contract parameters on patient care workers without their consent. In response, the patient care workers voted to strike with 96 percent in favor and the 25,000-member service worker unit voting to strike in solidarity from Oct. 23 to Oct.  25.

“We’re striking because the university has decided that it wants to increasingly outsource jobs to save money and that it wants to deny [workers] a fair contract that they deserve,” said Todd Stenhouse, AFSCME 3299 representative for patient care workers at the UC San Francisco medical facility.

The patient care (EX) branch of the union, which operates under a separate contract from the service (SX) branch, has been in deadlocked negotiations with the university for almost 18 months. According to a press release from AFSCME 3299, the university imposed employment terms on patient care workers that would increase healthcare premiums, flatten wages, lift the retirement age and continue outsourcing union-protected jobs.

“We can’t solve the problem alone. We need the UC to sit down and commit to ending this practice.” said Chris Flink, AFSCME media contact for UC Santa  Cruz.

To accommodate for strike activities, many UC health centers took precautions to ensure that the workload was manageable with the reduced staff. At UCSF, surgeries scheduled during the strike were reduced, clinic visits and outpatient procedures were postponed and temporary workers were hired.

AFSCME 3299 EX unit president Monica de Leon pointed out the hypocrisy of the university’s stifling labor terms placed on patient care workers, while its leaders enjoyed pay raises and hid slush  funds.

“UC’s latest actions represent an assault not just on the collective bargaining process and the frontline workers that make the UC system run every day, but on the values that this institution is supposed to represent,” said de Leon in a press release.

Nicolas Gutierrez (second from left), a senior custodian from College 9, was a key member of the strike effort, leading the march and speaking at rallies.
Photo by Lluvia Moreno.

TUESDAY — CAMPUS STRIKE ACTIVITY

Though the sun wouldn’t rise for hours, at 4:50 a.m. on Oct. 23,  AFSCME 3299 members set up tents and tables at the main entrance to campus. Accompanying them were the notes of a harmonica and the watchful eyes of police lurking in the shadowy lot across the street.

By 6:45 a.m., about 50 protesters marched from corner to corner around the intersection at Bay and High streets. More protestors arrived and joined the action as the sun came out, overseen by several volunteer crossing guards.

“The UC can contract out our jobs at any time and that’s a big risk for everyone here,” said Nicolas Gutierrez, senior custodian for College Nine. “We’re also out in solidarity with the patient care technicals folks that work at the medical centers. […] We are here to put an end to the outsourcing and also the discrimination here at UC.”

Although spirits were high and the campus entrance remained open all day, police maintained a constant presence at the base of campus with cars being sent to the West entrance as well. Police ticketed jay-walkers and several vehicles for obstructing traffic. UC Chief of Police Nader Oweis said he could not give an estimate of the number of UC police present at the strike at this time, but at the May AFSCME 3299 strike, about 125 officers were present.

Students accounted for about half the strike presence, emphatically leading chants, serving as crossing guards and keeping energy levels up. Striking workers welcome support from the campus  community.

“It’s appalling, the way the UC has been treating them, neglecting their needs for a living wage while refusing to acknowledge the increases and the costs of health care and housing,” said Grant Black, a UCSC undergraduate at the picket line. “[They’re] not giving them the necessary needs to let these workers do the best job they can or treating them with the dignity they  deserve.”

The protest was scheduled to shut down by 6 p.m., but the picket line did not put down their signs until the sun began to set.

A student organizer leads a chant at the UCSF march.
Photo by Christina Bulosan.

WEDNESDAY — RALLY ON SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL CENTER

AFSCME  3299 protests from around the Bay Area joined patient care technical workers at the UCSF Medical Center on Wednesday. Some arrived by BART or carpool — about 60 people from the front lines in Santa Cruz were shuttled by bus to the rally.

University Professional and Technical Employees (UPTE) union members and hotel workers represented by UNITED HERE additionally came to support. Between AFSCME 3299 and UPTE, the number of patient care workers at UCSF represented by unions totals 7,176.

“They don’t value the hard work that we do,” said UCSF blood bank technician Claudia Russo. “Our doctors and our nurses are wonderful, but they cannot do their job without us being here. The patients cannot be taken care of properly when you have workers that are being paid at subpar level.”

Concerns about outsourcing resulting in inadequate and insufficient employment — as well as gender and racial inequality — were prevalent among many protesters during the strike. However, for others, the issue of economic inequality stood equally grave.

“If [UC administration] can get us for cheaper, they will try,” said David Treacy, another UCSF technician. “And so they do try with third-party workers. They bring them in and they aren’t as prepared to support the hospital well.”

UCSF administration were critical of the union’s decision to strike. Chancellor Sam Hawgood and UCSF Health CEO Mark Laret issued a joint letter to the UCSF community elaborating on their stance on the strike.

“We value our employees and respect their rights to representation and freedom of speech. That said, striking is a serious matter, especially when it directly affects vital public services,” Hagwood and Laret wrote. “Every day, our patients entrust their lives to us, and in turn, we are responsible for ensuring that they receive the highest quality care in a safe and secure environment.”

REACTIONS FROM THE UNIVERSITY

The UC has been outspoken in its denunciation of the AFSCME 3299 demonstrations in the past — considering the strikes to be illegal and a direct attack on patients and students.

“It is highly inappropriate for any union to threaten services to patients and students with a strike as a negotiating tactic,” according to a statement from  the university. “UC believes it would be considered illegal for certain UC patient care staff to strike because it would pose an imminent threat to public health and safety and improperly withhold healthcare from the  public.”

The UC released several additional statements urging union members not to participate in their union’s strikes. These statements claim the UC has offered patient care and service workers reasonable contract terms, including what it describes as adequate pay increases and excellent benefits for the next four years.

These statements also maintain the university is supporting employees who plan on coming to work during strikes and will not deduct union fines from employees’ paychecks in the event non participating union members are fined.

“No employee is ever obligated to strike,” said a press release from the UCOP. “Unions are legally prohibited from threatening or coercing members in other ways to keep them from coming to work […] UC will assist employees who want to work by providing security or transportation across  picket  lines.”

Chancellor Blumenthal said that despite this being the second time AFSCME 3299 workers have found it necessary to strike, he did not feel it was appropriate to advocate for the workers in the context of his role as chancellor.

“I am not the negotiating party here, but I am a voice. I believe very strongly that we need to pay fair wages, we need to pay wages that are consistent in the marketplace, and we need to pay living wages,” he said. “In terms of my own beliefs and advocacy, I don’t share [those views]. This isn’t my negotiation.”

AFSCME 3299 demonstrators march at the base of campus.
Photo by Tiffany Lee.

THURSDAY — FRONT LINES ON THE FINAL DAY

The last day of the strike will entail picketing and tabling. Loop bus drivers will remain on strike until Thursday night and city buses will continue to respect the picket line until AFSCME 3299’s strike  concludes.

Student support so far has invigorated the strike actions at the base of campus, and union workers hope they continue to participate. According to Chris Flink, AFSCME 3299 spokesperson for UC Santa Cruz, this is proof the Santa Cruz population stands behind the workers.

Chris Flink at the UCSC protest emphasized that the issues of the workers are inextricable from the city itself.

“This is the Santa Cruz community. These are people who live and work in Santa Cruz, and who want to continue to live and work here,” he said. “The community needs to understand when the university is doing wrong things. And that’s what we’re seeing right now.”

The university has made no moves to change its stance at time of press.

Additional reporting by Karen Lowe and  other CHP staff.

 


Warning: require(/home/chp2009/cityonahillpress.com/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/legacy/Newspaper): failed to open stream: Success in /home/chp2009/cityonahillpress.com/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1510

Fatal error: require(): Failed opening required '/home/chp2009/cityonahillpress.com/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/legacy/Newspaper/' (include_path='.:') in /home/chp2009/cityonahillpress.com/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1510